Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 11 to 13 of 13

Thread: Stupid Question

  1. #11
    Inactive Member wahiba's Avatar
    Join Date
    April 22nd, 2002
    Posts
    181
    Follows
    0
    Following
    0
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quoted
    0 Post(s)

    Post

    What is smooth motion?

    If an object is moving quite fast then 18fps or 24 fps is not going to make much difference. similarly if something is moving very slowly.

    I have videoed plenty of movement and never noticed lack of smoothness. Maybe it is like persistence of vision and we smooth it out in our minds, unless one is really looking for it.

    Actually it is quite interesting how low one can get. something it is possible to test out on setting movies at different speeds on the computer. 12 fps seems to be the lowest that is still reasonable, even so 8 fps is not un watcheable.

  2. #12
    Inactive Member mattias's Avatar
    Join Date
    August 3rd, 1999
    Posts
    335
    Follows
    0
    Following
    0
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quoted
    0 Post(s)

    Post

    <BLOCKQUOTE><font size=2 face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif">quote:</font><table border="0" width="90%" bgcolor="#333333" cellspacing="1" cellpadding="0"><tr><td width="100%"><table border="0" width="100%" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="2" bgcolor="#FF9900"><tr><td width="100%" bgcolor="#DDDDDD"><font size=2 face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif">What is smooth motion?

    If an object is moving quite fast then 18fps or 24 fps is not going to make much difference. similarly if something is moving very slowly.</font></td></tr></table></td></tr></table></BLOCKQUOTE>

    that's correct, but in any given situation 24 fps will look smoother.

    <BLOCKQUOTE><font size=2 face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif">quote:</font><table border="0" width="90%" bgcolor="#333333" cellspacing="1" cellpadding="0"><tr><td width="100%"><table border="0" width="100%" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="2" bgcolor="#FF9900"><tr><td width="100%" bgcolor="#DDDDDD"><font size=2 face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif">I have videoed plenty of movement and never noticed lack of smoothness.</font></td></tr></table></td></tr></table></BLOCKQUOTE>

    video uses 50 or 60 fps and a 100% duty cycle, that's why.

    i also used the expression persistance of vision before to describe why we see a series of stills as motion, but somebody explained that the motion is created in the brain, while p.o.v. is a "slowness" in the retina that evens out flicker above certain frequencies. i wouldn't be surprised if these two phenomenon work together though...

    /matt

  3. #13
    Inactive Member MovieStuff's Avatar
    Join Date
    July 28th, 2001
    Posts
    847
    Follows
    0
    Following
    0
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quoted
    0 Post(s)

    Post

    <BLOCKQUOTE><font size=2 face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif">quote:</font><table border="0" width="90%" bgcolor="#333333" cellspacing="1" cellpadding="0"><tr><td width="100%"><table border="0" width="100%" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="2" bgcolor="#FF9900"><tr><td width="100%" bgcolor="#DDDDDD"><font size=2 face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif">Originally posted by mattias:

    running one of those at 50 fps would surely look very much like video
    </font></td></tr></table></td></tr></table></BLOCKQUOTE>

    Agreed. In fact, anyone with an Elmo or Goko viewer that has a prism shutter can see the effect themselves by rewinding some film through the gate at high speed and watching the resulting image. Looks justs like video.

    Roger

Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •